NPR Report: Private Prison Industry Behind Arizona's SB 1070

Friday, May 29, 2009

Gov. Schwarzenegger's Proposed Budget Cuts Endanger Immigrant Health Programs

Health care advocates are organizing campaigns to defeat the proposed budget cuts that California Governor Arnold Schwarzenneger has made public in response to the extreme financial crisis that the Golden State faces. The proposed cuts would particularly harm low income families, immigrants and children - three extremely vulnerable sectors of our society in which Mexican Americans and other Latinos are over-represented.

The revised 2009 budget proposal presented by Governor Schwarzenneger on May 15 intends to address the $15.2 billion shortfall and also create a $2 billion reserve.

The proposed health care cuts total $2.2 billion. Among other things, the proposal would:

  • Rollback Medical eligibility levels, potentially excluding 1 million Californians from this service.
  • Eliminate the Healthy Families program, denying coverage to over 1 million children.
  • Limit health services to legal immigrants over 20 years old, potentially affecting over 80,000 people.
  • Eliminate funding for several community clining programs, including those serving farmworkers and Native Americans.
  • Eliminate maternal, child and adolescent health grants to local health jurisdictions.
A more extensive analysis of the budget proposal and its impact on Californians is presented by Health Access in a fact sheet you can access here.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Latinos: 22% of all US Children

A new report released by the PEW Hispanic Center provides the latest information on a topic that began to draw attention several decades ago, when experts began to do the first demographic projections that took into account the potential growth of the Mexican-origin and Latino populations. The study released today indicates that Hispanics are now 22% of all US children under 18 years of age - a dramatic increase over the 9% they represented in 1980. Furthermore, 52% of the 16 million Latino children are the sons or daughters of immigrants.

Among the pioneer scholars who carried out serious studies in the past is David Hayes-Bautista, co-author of the landmark study The Burden of Support: Young Latinos in an Aging Society (Stanford University Press, 1988), which examined the aging of California society, the decline in the birth rates on non-Latinos, the continuing demand for young workers to support the economy, and the roles young Latinos played in contemporary society, as well as different scenarios for California's future (from a best case scenario to a worst case scenario). The state-level analysis emphasized the need to prepare and educate the growing Latino youth because they would constitute the backbone of the future labor force and, hence, the well-being of California would rest on their contributions. Denying them access to education and other opportunities would only endanger California's future.

Another important study conducted by Hayes-Bautista focused on an historic landmark: according to a 2001 study examining county by county births, by the summer of that year the majority of the children being born in California were Latinos. As a consequence, the state would approach a new era in 2019, when these babies would turn into adults and be able to vote.

The new Pew report now draws attention to the importance of developing national-level policies to ensure that these children have fair access to the educational and other opportunities that will enable them to be productive members of society. Denying them access to education, health care and basic civil rights is certainly the wrong approach to follow.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Employers Seek Reform: Immigration Works USA Summit in Washington, DC

Immigration Works USA, a national network of employers seeking to promote an immigration reform, is organizing a summit in Washington, DC on June 15, in an attemp to lobby Congress to move ahead with a reform.

The summit information is shown below, as posted on the organization's website:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ImmigrationWorks USA invites you to a day-long strategy session and lobby day

STORMING THE HILL
Join the business grassroots campaign for immigration reform

WHEN June 15, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

WHERE Marriott Washington, 1221 22nd Street, NW

WHO SHOULD ATTEND
Employers for immigration reformBusiness owners who rely on immigrant workersTrade association executives who represent themCitizens who believe immigrants are good for America

Mounting evidence suggests that the administration and Congress will make a push to pass immigration reform in 2009, despite the recession. But even with large Democratic majorities in Congress, there can be no hope of enacting new law without Republicans and centrist Democrats. And there can be no hope of mobilizing these lawmakers without vocal support from employers who hire immigrants.

Business owners from across America are gathering in Washington to launch a national advocacy campaign. We’ll discuss our must-haves – what do employers need in a bill? We’ll coordinate strategy – grasstops tactics in the states and a national grassroots mobilization, using the new media to build an army of engaged, informed employers ready to make their views known to Congress.

It’s time to launch a national campaign – business owners standing up for what we need in an immigration bill.

Come to Washington to plan. Come to Washington to build. Come to Washington to make your voice heard with like-minded others from across America.

If you are INTERESTED IN ATTENDING, please email sreagan@ImmigrationWorksUSA.org.

We encourage you to STAY OVER in Washington and meet with your representatives on June 16.

To RESERVE A ROOM at the Marriott Washington, call 800 393-3053.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Immigrant Success: Two Ways to Achieve the American Dream?

Immigrant integration into the US can manifest itself in many ways, including the possibility of improving one's socio-economic status or, to put it more directly, to achieve what is popularly known as the American Dream.

There may be as many ways to achieve the American Dream as there are individuals seeking to obtain it. However, in evaluating the success or failure in achieving it is incorrect to focus attention only on the individual level - that is, by ONLY taking into account one's qualities, work ethic, talents, etc. Scholars, and common sense, also suggest that one must ALSO take into consideration other factors including the legal/institutional opportunities or barriers that a given person faces. This observation is relevant because over the course of US history, national (as well as state and local level) immigration policies have treated social groups differently. For example, the country's first law dealing with naturalization, the Naturalization Law of 1790, specified that only free "white" immigrants would be permitted to become naturalized citizens. The definition of "white" varied over time but the restriction was not eliminated until the passage of the Walter-McCarran Act of 1952 - 160 years later.

Having stated this, it is interesting to find that academic experts on immigration such as Alejandro Portes and Ruben Rumbaut have argued that there are two ways to "make it" in America. One way to achieve it is by pursuing higher education and following what the authors call the salaried professional/managerial route. The second way is to enter the private sector and follow the independent entrepreneurial route. Obviously, an implication of such an observation is that immigrants should be encouraged to pursue higher education and become professionals and independent business owners.

How relevant is this interpretation to the various immigrant groups?

How have Mexican immigrants performed in these two scenarios?

How would proposed reforms, such as the DREAM Act, improve results?

What other reforms or changes are necessary to create greater opportunities to immigrants who arrived as adults and perhaps even professional degrees, but cannot access the labor market in their respective professions?

In subsequent entries we hope to explore in depth these and other matters.

Sources:
Alejandro Portes and Ruben Rumbaut, Immigrant America: A Portrait (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).
Ronald Takaki, From Different Shores: Perspectives on Race and Ethnicity in America (New York and Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press, 1994).

Sonia Sotomayor Nominada a la Suprema Corte/ Sonia Sotomayor Nominated to the Supreme Court

Es muy gratificante recibir la noticia que el Presidente Barack Obama ha nominado a Sonia Sotomayor para reemplazar al juez David Souter en la Suprema Corte, abriendo la posibilidad de tener por primera vez en la historia a una persona de origen latino en el máximo tribunal del país. Sonia es de origen puertorriqueño y proviene de una familia humilde. En las siguientes semanas se estará discutiendo en caso en el Senado, institución que tiene la facultad de aprobar o rechazar la nominación.

¡Felicidades a Sonia y a la comunidad Boricua!

El discurso de Obama y la información biográfica y profesional de Sonia se pueden leer haciendo click aquí. Un video sobre ella se encuentra aquí.

It is very gratifying to know that President Barack Obama has nominated Sonia Sotomayor to replace Judge David Souter in the US Supreme Court, creating th eopportunity to have for the first time in histoy a person of Latino-origin in the highest court of the nation. Sonia is of Puerto Rican-origin and comes from a family of modest means. In the weeks that follow her case will be discussed in the Senate, the institution that has the authority to approve or reject her nomination.

Congratulations to Sonia and the Boricua community!

Obama’s speech and the biographical and professional background on Sonia can be read by clicking here. A video about her can be seen here.

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Mexican Immigration: Four Key Features

Immigration to the United States is an interesting but complex issue that draws much debate among scholars and also a good amount of public discussion. The Mexican case is more atypical due to the fact that it is a phenomenon that includes at least four characteristics that differentiate it from others. Here's a brief introduction to them:

1. Part of the Mexican-origin population in the US was incorporated through annexation as a result of a war. At the time of the 1846-48 war, there were some 100,000 Mexicans in what is now the Southwest (estimates range from 80-120,000).

2. As a mas phenomenon, immigration from Mexico has existed for over a hundred years, whereas other cases have had a much older, shorter, or erratic existence.

3. A decisive factor in originating, formalizing, and sustaining Mexican immigration has been the continuing US demand for Mexican labor and the ensuing recruitment that has taken place by employers and authorities. Mexicans began to migrate in significant numbers in the 1880s, when employers (mining, agriculture, railroads) turned to the south in order to replace foreign labor that was lost due to the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. During World War I a labor program came into existence, even though Mexico itself was engaged in a civil war of its own (1910 Revolution) and the 1917 Constitution sough to discourage and control such an emigration. During World War II a new and greater labor recruitment program (the Bracero Program) was established, lasting from 1942-64. During this time, some 4.5 million contracts for seasonal labor were awarded. The program was terminated but the demand continued through informal (undocumented) and formal (documented) means. The Bracero Program reinforced the tendency of having Mexicans come to the US to perform manual, low-paying labor. Hence, most Mexican immigrants have historically been working class. The pattern has shifted more recently, influenced by the exodus of more urban and better educated Mexicans as a result of the various economic crises (1982, etc.).

4. Mexico, like Canada and the United States, are part of a regional economy that was created with the adoption of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1993 and its implementation on January 1, 1994. At the time of the debate over NAFTA, serious immigration scholars emphasized that the accord would have the effect of increasing Mexican migration flows to the north for several decades. NAFTA presented an opportunity to integrate labor flows into the discussion and, possibly, reduce the political conflict that has taken place since. However, the authorities of that time decided to exclude labor from the negotiations.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Graduation Time!

We have a graduation in the family, so the posting will be limited today and tomorrow ... although we may have a chance to add some new things. Keep checking!

Sources Dealing with the A H1N1 Influenza Virus

The concern over the AH1N1 influenza virus, and its impact on Mexico, the United States, Canada, and other nations continues. You may find valuable and reliable source of information in English and Spanish by clicking here.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Obama Nomina a Alejandro N. Mayorka para Dirigir la Oficina de Servicios de Inmigración y Ciudadanía (CIS)


El día de ayer, 20 de mayo, el Presidente Barack Obama envió al Senado una lista de tres personas como sus nominados a encabezar distintos puestos en su administración. Uno de los nominados es el abogado cubano Alejandro N. Mayorka, quien ha sido seleccionado para encabezar la oficina de Servicios de Inmigración y Ciudadanía (CIS).

Mayorka se ha desempeñado recientemente como integrante del bufete jurídico O’Melveny and Myers de Los Ángeles, California. Previamente, de 1998-2001 colaboró con el Departamento de Justicia como fiscal del Distrito Central de California. Asimismo, fue parte del equipo de transición de Obama.
Un artículo del LA Times ofrece más información al respecto:
http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_12271912?source=rss
El comunicado de prensa de la Casa Blanca:
Foto: LA Times

Reunión Cumbre en Washington DC para Lograr la Reforma Migratoria

El tema de mayor importancia para la población inmigrante en Estados Unidos es la reforma migratoria.

En otro momento analizaremos las razones por las cuales en décadas recientes no ha habido congruencia entre las políticas migratorias de Estados Unidos, los requisitos laborales de su economía, y los flujos migratorios que se han dado. En esta ocasión, solo abordaremos uno de los temas que por su urgencia nos debe de llamar la atención: la generación de una estrategia para concretar una reforma migratoria a corto plazo.

Sin duda alguna, el impresionante respaldo otorgado por la población latina a Barack Obama durante la pasada elección presidencial tuvo mucho que ver con la esperanza de que el entonces senador del estado de Illinois cumpliera su promesa de encabezar los esfuerzos para sacar adelante una reforma migratoria que se había quedado frustrada en varias ocasiones por la severa oposición de los legisladores republicanos y el temor de no pocos de sus colegas demócratas. El triunfo de Obama creó la esperanza de que, finalmente, se divisara luz al final del túnel. Sin embargo, dentro del equipo del presidente electo se manifestaban por lo menos dos posturas que creaban fricción interna y generaban confusión externa: un grupo proponía abordar de manera gradual el tema migratorio, buscando sacar adelante cambios parciales, por considerar que una reforma integral se quedaría estancada de nuevo y que le costaría mucho capital político al nuevo presidente; otro grupo consideraba que con el triunfo de Obama se había creado el momento histórico para empujar con energía, decisión, y el capital político necesario, hasta concretar la mejor reforma integral posible.

Durante las primeras semanas de la nueva administración hubo paciencia y expectación entre los integrantes del movimiento a favor de la reforma migratoria, aunque algunos señalaban que más bien parecía parálisis gubernamental o más de lo mismo, como cuando salieron a la luz pública noticias de nuevas redadas en lugares de trabajo. Curiosamente, el acelerado desplome de la economía llevó al nuevo presidente a actuar de manera más agresiva para impulsar medidas de rescate financiero y económico en el congreso, apoyado por las mayorías demócratas en ambas cámaras. Al lograr la aprobación de sus propuestas legislativas, se percibió la posibilidad de sacar adelante otros temas, como el de la reforma migratoria. Los sectores pro-migrantes dentro y fuera de la administración presionaron de manera directa e indirecta para que el asunto no se relegara. En diversas declaraciones públicas hechas en semanas recientes, Obama empezó a dar señas de que se estaba optando por una estrategia a favor de una reforma migratoria integral.
El movimiento pro-migrante ahora tiene una gran oportunidad de contribuir a una transformación significativa en las políticas migratorias de este país. A pesar de la crisis económica, el escenario político-legislativo es el mejor que se ha presentado en muchos años. Concretar una reforma integral no será fácil pero hay esperanzas de lograrlo.

Como parte de los esfuerzos que se han generado, se encuentra la creación de la campaña Reform Immigration for America (RIFA), la cual incluye la realización de una Reunión Cumbre en Washington, DC los días 3-5 de junio. En tal reunión se espera la participación de cientos de dirigentes de organizaciones o agencias que promueven la reforma migratoria. Además de discutir una agenda de acción común, se espera que el evento sirva para generar una mayor fuerza político-electoral que concrete la reforma migratoria a corto plazo.

La información sobre la cumbre se encuentra en la página de RIFA:

http://www.reformimmigrationforamerica.org/index.php

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Mexican Economy in Recession - La Economía Mexicana en Recesión

The Mexican economy has just experienced its worst quarter since 1995.

According to INEGI (National Institute of Statistics and Geography), during the first quarter of this year the Gross Domestic Product fell by 8.2%. In the preceding quarter the economy had also declined 1.6%. The worst results came from the secondary and tertiary sectors.

Below are highlights of the press release and the link to the document:


PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO EN MÉXICO DURANTE EL PRIMER TRIMESTRE DE 2009

· El INEGI informa que el Producto Interno Bruto (PIB) disminuyó (‑)8.2% en términos reales y a tasa anual durante el periodo enero-marzo de 20091. Este comportamiento se derivó del desempeño negativo de las Actividades Secundarias y Terciarias.

· El PIB de las Actividades Secundarias se redujo (‑)9.9% en el trimestre en cuestión, como resultado de los decrementos en sus cuatro sectores: las industrias manufactureras se contrajeron (‑)13.8%; la construcción (‑)7.7%; la electricidad, agua y suministro de gas por ductos al consumidor final (‑)3%, y la minería (‑)1.1 por ciento.

· El PIB de las Actividades Terciarias presentó una variación anual de (‑)7.8% en el primer trimestre de 2009, asociada a la menor producción de la mayoría de los sectores que las integran, destacando el comercio; los servicios inmobiliarios y de alquiler de bienes muebles e intangibles; transportes, correos y almacenamiento, y los servicios de alojamiento temporal y de preparación de alimentos y bebidas.

· En cambio, el PIB de las Actividades Primarias aumentó 1.4% durante el primer trimestre de este año respecto a igual lapso de 2008, como consecuencia del avance en el subsector de agricultura y ganadería, básicamente.

· Cifras desestacionalizadas indican que el PIB reportó una tasa de (‑)5.88% en el trimestre enero-marzo de 2009 en comparación con el trimestre inmediato anterior.

1Cabe señalar que este comportamiento a tasa anual se vio influido al alza por el hecho de que en 2008 el periodo de la Semana Santa se ubicó en el primer trimestre, mientras que en este año ocurrió en el segundo, teniéndose en el trimestre enero-marzo de 2009 un mayor número de días laborables que el mismo trimestre del año anterior.

http://www.inegi.org.mx/inegi/contenidos/espanol/prensa/comunicados/pibbol.asp

The Death of Roberto Martinez, a Pro-Immigrant Activist


Media sources are reporting that Roberto Martinez passed away today, May 20, 2009 due to diabetes-related complications.


Roberto was a long-time activist who shed much needed light on the human rights situation along the US-Mexico border. He was among those who consistently defended immigrants as human beings - no small feat in the era of immigrant bashing and criminalization. His work in the San Diego area as part of the American Friends Service Committee directing the US/Mexico Border Program will be long remembered and respected.


Descanse en paz, Don Roberto.
Photo: In Motion Magazine

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Los Tigres del Norte as a Model of Transnational Success?

Like other Mexican immigrants who spent time in Santa Clara County, California in the early 1970s, I became increasingly familiarized with a new, locally-based norteño group called Los Tigres del Norte.

The Spanish-language radio stations we tuned into played their songs constantly, including "Contrabando y Traición", the song about love, betrayal and drug trafficking that catapulted them to fame, and "La Cochicuina", a humorous tune that appealed to kids like us. Their origin in rural Sinaloa appealed to other immigrants from rural Mexico who labored in the fields of a region that at that time was undergoing a dramatic transformation - shedding its image as the Valley of Heart's Delight to incrasingly become known as the Silicon Valley, the most important center of high technology research and development in the world. In the Mexican immigrant musical scene, this change was manifested in the enormous popularity of California-based immigrant groups, like Los Humildes, that produced new musical creations combining elements of Mexican ranchera music and modern, rock-influenced, electronic instruments. Los Tigres del Norte too, soon shed their acoustic instruments and adopted electronic versions to develop a style that is distinct from the Tejano and Monterrey-based norteño tradition.

In their early years, Los Tigres played in dance halls, bars, family festivites, and in any other gig they could get, including promotions hosted by San Jose furniture stores. On one such occasion, my parents decided to drive to downtrown San Jose to see them. Unfortunately for us, as we arrived at the store in the downtown area, the musicians were already packing their instruments and speakers into an ancient, beat up station wagon, ready to go home and then prepare for whatever other gig came their way. I am pretty sure that at that time we also saw them at a place called Parque Paseo de las Flores, which was nothing more than a large back-yard of a property located near Kelley Park in San Jose, and that serve as a gathering place for immigrant families who wanted some popular entertainment but could not afford to pay much more than a few dollars.

Much has happened since then. Today, Los Tigres are recognized as an unprecedented musical phenomenon that has had unparalleled success over a period of time encompassing nearly four decades. Their dances in the US, Mexico, and other countries, draw tens of thousands of people. They have sold tens of millions of records, appeared in numerous movies, and are top attractions in television programs. Other musical groups (and trends) come and go but Los Tigres retain their superstar status.

Los Tigres deserve much credit for being able to remain appealing to their core audience, Mexican immigrants in the US, and to also expand that appeal to other social sectors and nations (particularly Central America). In fact, their continuing success across borders reflects their ability to recognize that they had something to offer (their musical production, then their movies) to Mexicans on both sides of the border. Los Tigres were and are part of both national communities and, somewhere along, they discovered that their binationalism (or transnationalism), as manifested in the songs, was coveted precisely because it was rooted in the immigrant experience. No better example of this exists than to see that like the migrants, the musical group spends part of the year in the US and the other part in Mexico.

While the musical production of Los Tigres has undergone an undeniable evolution, my particular preference lies in the songs recorded during the 1980s and early 1990s, when their principal composed was Enrique Franco, also a sinaloense who resided in San Jose at the time. Franco composed many of their all-time best and most influential songs, served as producer of the records, and accompanied them as an actor in the films of that time (inevitably based on the songs). What I find particularly significant is Franco's skill in transmitting social issues (immigration, social identity, conflict in Central America, political violence in Mexico, etc.) into eloquent songs with catchy, danceable rhythms that can appeal to the common person. Moreover, Los Tigres and Franco could recover a traditional song and re-launch it, transforming it into a modernized norteño hit. It is no surprise that their most influential record of this time, and perhaps their career, is Gracias ... América Sin Fronteras, a testament to immigrant dignity, a challenge to injustice, a reaffirmation of identity, an example of transformation and growth, and a masterpiece of popular culture.

Lo Tigres no longer rely on old, beat up station wagons to get around, but their development into a transnational musical, commercial and cultural phenomenon presents an example of what we, as immigrants, have to offer to the two nations to which we are linked.

Mexicans in the US: Datos, Datos and More Datos

The Mexican American community has grown significantly in recent decades, influenced by an influx of immigrants and a natural birth rate.

According to the most recent estimate from the US Census, in 2007 there were some 29.2 million US "residents of Mexican origin". They represented about 10% of the total US population and 64% of the nation's "Hispanic" population.

Mexicans in the US are a young social group. Their median age is 25.8 years, compared to 36.7 years for the nation as a whole.

Mexican American families are larger than the national counterparts. Mexican-orign families have 4.1 members, while other families average 3.2 people.

Mexicans participate in the labor force at higher rates than society as a whole. 68% of Mexican Americans over 16 are in the labor force, compared to 65% for the population as a whole.

The Pew Hispanic Center, for its part, estimates that there were 12.7 million Mexican immigrants in the United States.

Mexican immigrants represent 32% of all immigrants in the nation.

With respect to their nation of origin, Mexican immigrants in the US represent about 11% of Mexico's population.

7.259 million of these immigrants are men and 5.412 million are women.

The median age of Mexican immigrants in the US is 35.4 years.

Only 15% of Mexican immigrants have become naturalized US citizens.

65% of Mexican immigrants live in married-couple households.

Sources:

1. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013395.html

2. http://pewhispanic.org/files/factsheets/47.pdf

Monday, May 18, 2009

Being a Mexican in the United States

Being a Mexican in the United States is, without a doubt, one of the most fascinating experiences a person may have in the contemporary era.

This blog will celebrate this experience, examine the diversity and achievements of the Mexican immigrant community, address issues that are of relevance to our lives, discuss the nature of our ties to Mexico and the United States and, most importantly, try to have fun as well.

Writing may require effort but it should also be a pleasure ... for the writer and the reader.

Y, por supuesto que el blog incluirá información en español … y probablemente también algo de Spanglish.

¡Bienvenidos!