NPR Report: Private Prison Industry Behind Arizona's SB 1070

Monday, September 19, 2011

Not In Our Town: Light in the Darkness Trailer - Airing on PBS on Sept. 20, 2011



This exceptional documentary will be airing on PBS on Wednesday, Sept. 21.

The documentary explores the local level impact of an anti-immigrant hate crime which took place in Patchogue, New York in 2008, when Ecuadorian immigrant Marcelo Lucero was killed. The documentary examines the local community's reaction to the crime.

In addition to the airing of the film, events are being organized throughout the country to hold local level meetings and discussions.

For more information, visit the website: http://www.niot.org/lightinthedarkness

In addition, the following press release has been prepared:


Not In Our Town: Light in the Darkness Premieres on PBS Sept. 21, 2011
For Immediate Release                                                                                 
NOT IN OUR TOWN: LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS PROFILES A LONG ISLAND COMMUNITY TAKING ACTION FOLLOWING A HATE CRIME KILLING

Documentary Narrated by Academy Award®-Nominee Alfre Woodard Debuts
Wednesday, September 21 on PBS

Not In Our Town Week of Action Kicks Off September 18

New York, NY (July 21, 2011) – Not In Our Town: Light in the Darkness a new film which documents the story of a town standing together to take action after a hate crime killing devastates their community – will debut Wednesday, September 21 at 10:00 p.m. ET on PBS (check local listings).  Narrated by Academy Award®-Nominee Alfre Woodard, the documentary addresses the growing problem of anti-immigrant violence in communities nationwide. 

In 2008, a series of attacks by a group of seven local teenagers against Latino residents of the Long Island, New York town of Patchogue ended with the killing of 37-year-old Marcelo Lucero. An Ecuadorian immigrant, Lucero had been a Patchogue resident for 13 years.  Filmed over a two-year period, the documentary follows Mayor Paul Pontieri, the victim’s brother Joselo Lucero, diverse community leaders, residents and students as they openly address the underlying causes of the violence, work to heal divisions and initiate ongoing action to ensure everyone in their village will be safe and respected. 

“As the country becomes increasingly divided about immigration, we hope this film sparks constructive discussions that separate policy differences from human issues and community safety, so that what happened in Patchogue will never happen again,”  said Patrice O’Neill, Executive Producer and Director, Light in the Darkness and Founder of The Working Group.

The film serves as the centerpiece of Not In Our Town’s National Week of Action.  From September 18-24, public media outlets and communities across the country will host screenings, events and discussions on hate crime prevention, working to develop new ways to make their towns safer.  Public media stations in 20 markets, along with partner organizations including the Department of Justice Community Oriented Policing Services Office, National Council of Churches, National League of Cities, Interfaith Immigration Coalition, National Hispanic Media Coalition, United Methodist Women, and Welcoming America will use the film to initiate dialogue about issues of intolerance in their communities.

Light in the Darkness is the third PBS special from Not In Our Town, a project from The Working Group, whose mission is to highlight stories of communities taking positive action to fight intolerance. Not In Our Town was launched in 1995 with the national PBS special Not In Our Town, which followed the citizens of Billings, Montana as they joined forces to resist bigotry in their town. Not In Our Town II, a follow-up broadcast, aired in 1996 and showed how communities adapted the experience from Billings to counteract local hate violence. Over the past 15 years, Not In Our Town has grown from a PBS documentary into a national effort to connect people working together to take action against hate and create safe, inclusive communities.  

Not In Our Town Light in the Darkness was directed by Patrice O’Neill and produced by The Working Group. Adrienne Calo and Charene Zalis serve as producers, with consulting producer Ray Telles. The film was edited by Linda Peckham, Andrew Gersh and Jill Strong, with principal photography by Brian Dentz.

Major support for this program is provided by PBS, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and the Einhorn Family Charitable Trust. Additional support has been provided by the Reva and David Logan Foundation and Public Welfare Foundation.

For additional information, please visit: http://www.niot.org/LightInTheDarkness.

Media Contacts:
Not In Our Town and The Working Group:
Jayna Zelman, Rubenstein Communications
212-843-8044     jzelman@rubenstein.com

Jodi Sevin Patkin, Rubenstein Communications
212-843-8393   jsevin@rubenstein.com



###


Thursday, August 25, 2011

Robert Reich: This Labor Day We Need Protest Marches Rather Than Parades

Noted economist and former Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, has emphasized over the years the importance of using the well-being of working families as an indicator of the nation's overall economic health and prosperity. More recently, he has also been critical of the measures which have or have not been taken to address the deep recession and high unemployment that we suffer. Thus, it is not at all surprising that he now suggests that working families have little to celebrate on Labor Day. Instead of parading, he suggests, they should be protesting.

A brief excerpt from this article:

"The ratio of corporate profits to wages is now higher than at any time since just before the Great Depression.

Meanwhile, the American economy has all but stopped growing -- in large part because consumers (whose spending is 70 percent of GDP) are also workers whose jobs and wages are under assault.

Perhaps there would still be something to celebrate on Labor Day if government was coming to the rescue. But Washington is paralyzed, the president seems unwilling or unable to take on labor-bashing Republicans, and several Republican governors are mounting direct assaults on organized labor (see Indiana, Ohio, Maine, and Wisconsin, for example).

So let's bag the picnics and parades this Labor Day. American workers should march in protest. They're getting the worst deal they've had since before Labor Day was invented -- and the economy is suffering as a result."

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

La Popularidad de Obama Cae Entre la Población Latina

Para nadie es un secreto que la popularidad del Presidente Barack Obama ha caído de manera significativa entre electores latinos y la población latina en general. Las razones son muchas, entre las que se pueden destacar: la continua debilidad de la economía, la cual ha afectado seriamente a las familias latinas; altos niveles de desempleo; la ausencia, hasta hace unos días, de mejorías en las políticas migratorias del país; etc.

Si bien el estado de la economía y el desempleo alto son problemas generalizados que afectan a la nación, la población latina si tiene intereses particulares, como en el caso de una reforma migratoria, que han sido descuidadas por los poderes ejecutivo y legislativo.

Resultará interesante ver el comportamiento del electorado latino en la eleccion del 2012, puesto que los legisladores federales del partido Republicano, y sus contrapartes en muchas entidades estatales, son quienes han bloqueado una reforma migratoria y/o impulsado o aprobado leyes anti-inmigrantes.

Los Latinos verán a Obama y a los demócratas como la opción menos mala? Se aumentará el apoyo latino a los republicanos?

El desencanto actual con Obama es documentado por una nueva encuesta realizada por Impremedia/Latino Decisions. A continuación, un fragmento del articulo publicado en La Opinión y el link para dicha nota:
El más reciente sondeo Impremedia/Latino Decisions, realizado entre finales de julio y principios de agosto muestra que el nivel de voto seguro de los latinos por Obama en 2012 permanece a niveles insuficientes para, a estas alturas, ofrecer la supermayoría del voto hispano necesario para que el presidente pueda ganar determinados estados difíciles, como Nuevo México, Colorado y otros del oeste.

Actualmente, sólo el 39% de los votantes latinos está seguro de votar por el presidente Obama el año que viene. Esa cifra era de 43% en febrero, cuando IM/LD realizó una encuesta similar y había subido a 49% en junio, tras la captura de Osama Bin Laden y el discurso de Obama en El Paso, Texas, reafirmando su apoyo sobre la inmigración.

La encuesta también halló que sólo la mitad de los votantes latinos está "entusiasmado" para votar en las elecciones presidenciales del próximo año, un 26% está "algo" entusiasmado.

Friday, August 19, 2011

Tea Party Origins and Key Features

Campbell and Putnam offer a ver interesting analysis of the origins and key features of the Tea Party movement.

An excerpt:



Our analysis casts doubt on the Tea Party’s “origin story.” Early on, Tea Partiers were often described as nonpartisan political neophytes. Actually, the Tea Party’s supporters today were highly partisan Republicans long before the Tea Party was born, and were more likely than others to have contacted government officials. In fact, past Republican affiliation is the single strongest predictor of Tea Party support today.

What’s more, contrary to some accounts, the Tea Party is not a creature of the Great Recession. Many Americans have suffered in the last four years, but they are no more likely than anyone else to support the Tea Party. And while the public image of the Tea Party focuses on a desire to shrink government, concern over big government is hardly the only or even the most important predictor of Tea Party support among voters.

So what do Tea Partiers have in common? They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do.

More important, they were disproportionately social conservatives in 2006 — opposing abortion, for example — and still are today. Next to being a Republican, the strongest predictor of being a Tea Party supporter today was a desire, back in 2006, to see religion play a prominent role in politics. And Tea Partiers continue to hold these views: they seek “deeply religious” elected officials, approve of religious leaders’ engaging in politics and want religion brought into political debates. The Tea Party’s generals may say their overriding concern is a smaller government, but not their rank and file, who are more concerned about putting God in government.

Friday, August 5, 2011

The Wrong Worries- Another Excellent Article by Krugman

Paul Krugman's consistent claims that it is necessary for US economic policy to focus on employment creation has been admirable, in light of the continuously high unemployment rates at the national level and, even more so, in states with high Latino and Mexican-origin populations.

His most recent op-ed in the NY Times calls attention once again to this issue, now framed within the context of the drastic declines in the stock markets in the US and other countries.

As he indicates in the excerpt below, the ratio of employment to population has remained virtually the same during the last two years, resulting in a lastin human catastrophe.

"Yes, officially the recession ended two years ago, and the economy did indeed pull out of a terrifying tailspin. But at no point has growth looked remotely adequate given the depth of the initial plunge. In particular, when employment falls as much as it did from 2007 to 2009, you need a lot of job growth to make up the lost ground. And that just hasn’t happened.

Consider one crucial measure, the ratio of employment to population. In June 2007, around 63 percent of adults were employed. In June 2009, the official end of the recession, that number was down to 59.4. As of June 2011, two years into the alleged recovery, the number was: 58.2.

These may sound like dry statistics, but they reflect a truly terrible reality. Not only are vast numbers of Americans unemployed or underemployed, for the first time since the Great Depression many American workers are facing the prospect of very-long-term — maybe permanent — unemployment. Among other things, the rise in long-term unemployment will reduce future government revenues, so we’re not even acting sensibly in purely fiscal terms. But, more important, it’s a human catastrophe."

The complete article:

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Immigrants are key to California's future

Today's L.A. Times has an excellent op ed by Peter Schrag, who has been one of the most persistent writers in the state addressing the demographic transformation of California and the political/electoral irrationality that persists.

A fragment of the article and the link:

Immigrants are key to California's future - latimes.com: "Yet as boomers retire by the millions beginning in this decade, taking their skills with them, California, rather than making college and other advanced education more accessible, is making access harder, shutting down programs and increasing the costs. 'Cultivating a stronger base of future home buyers,' Myers says, 'will help the older generation as much as the young. This partnership needs to be strengthened between older future home sellers and younger potential home buyers.'

So far, however, the critical economic and social nexus between the self-interest of older white homeowners and the younger Latinos and other immigrants who represent much of the state's future is hardly perceived by much of California's tax-averse electorate."

Monday, July 25, 2011

Dream Act News: California Governor Jerry Brown eases path for undocumented college students to receive aid

Congratulations to Gov. Brown and Gil Cedillo!

Jerry Brown eases path for undocumented college students to receive aid - latimes.com: "Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation Monday allowing undocumented college students to access private financial aid for college, calling the new law “another piece of an investment in people.” But he said he was not yet ready to commit to signing a second piece of the Dream Act, which would provide public funding for those students.

Brushing over the politics of illegal immigration during a ceremony at the Los Angeles City College library, Brown talked about the bill within the broader context of maintaining education funding during the budget crisis.

“We are facing many obstacles and adversaries,” Brown said. “The debate is very clear: shrivel public service, shrink back, retrench, retreat from higher education, from schools, from the investment in people; or make the investment. So this is one piece of a very important mosaic, which is a California that works for everyone and a California who understands where our strength is."

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Más de un millón de mexicanos, listos para inmigrar a EU; se encuentran en lista de espera

Más de un millón de mexicanos, listos para inmigrar a EU - El Universal - El Mundo: "Casi un millón 400 mil mexicanos están en las listas de espera para inmigrar en forma legal a Estados Unidos a través de la petición de un familiar, un trámite que podría forzarlos a esperar hasta 18 años, según datos oficiales difundidos hoy.

Las cifras del Departamento de Estado de Estados Unidos, correspondientes al año fiscal 2010, muestran que a pesar de la cantidad de mexicanos en espera de inmigrar, sólo se concedieron 26 mil entre octubre de 2009 y septiembre de 2010.

La limitación en el número de visas disponibles para quienes buscan inmigrar a través del sistema de familia extendida, definida como los hijos adultos o los hermanos de un ciudadano estadounidense, ha motivado un enorme rezago."

Monday, July 18, 2011

La Serpiente sin Cabeza. La fútil cacería de capos.

Interesante nota en el Milenio de hoy:

La Serpiente sin Cabeza. La fútil cacería de capos. | blogs.milenio.com: "De acuerdo con un reporte de inteligencia de la Oficina de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas de Estados Unidos (CBP, por sus siglas en inglés), obtenido por MILENIO, todo apunta a que la disponibilidad de droga en calles estadunidenses es independiente de qué tan fuerte se golpee a las estructuras de mando de los cárteles.

En el reporte, fechado el 13 de julio pasado y creado 'sólo para uso oficial', la agencia estadunidense echa por tierra la idea de que la decapitación de un cártel deja a la organización herida de muerte, un tema altamente polémico que va contra la ortodoxia y esfuerzos gubernamentales que presumen la caída de capos como grandes logros. La duda se resume a dos puntos: ¿Puede la cacería exitosa de un narco de peso reducir la oferta de narcóticos? ¿Si no hay un jefe, los embarques se detienen?

Para responder esas y otras interrogantes, CBP se basó en tendencias detectadas tras la muerte y arresto de jefes criminales entre febrero de 2009 y febrero de 2010, incluidos operadores de alto nivel del cártel de los Beltrán Leyva, el Golfo, Los Zetas y el cártel de Sinaloa.

"Desde 2008 los cárteles mexicanos han perdido personajes clave, quienes fueron arrestados o abatidos. Este análisis enfrenta la principal pregunta que surge de esto: ¿afecta eso el flujo de narcóticos a Estados Unidos?", se cuestionó CBP. Su respuesta es no."

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant - Jose Antonio Vargas

Jose Antonio Vargas, an undocumented immigrant from the Philippines who went on to become a Pulitzer prize winning author, has written a moving account of his personal experience in an attempt to influence immigration policy in Washington, D.C.

A brief excerpt:

I’ve tried. Over the past 14 years, I’ve graduated from high school and college and built a career as a journalist, interviewing some of the most famous people in the country. On the surface, I’ve created a good life. I’ve lived the American dream.

But I am still an undocumented immigrant. And that means living a different kind of reality. It means going about my day in fear of being found out. It means rarely trusting people, even those closest to me, with who I really am. It means keeping my family photos in a shoebox rather than displaying them on shelves in my home, so friends don’t ask about them. It means reluctantly, even painfully, doing things I know are wrong and unlawful. And it has meant relying on a sort of 21st-century underground railroad of supporters, people who took an interest in my future and took risks for me.


The complete article:

My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant - NYTimes.com

Sunday, June 19, 2011

With executive pay, rich pull away from rest of America - The Washington Post

An interesting Washington Post article on the growing economic disparity in the nation:

An excerpt:

For years, statistics have depicted growing income disparity in the United States, and it has reached levels not seen since the Great Depression. In 2008, the last year for which data are available, for example, the top 0.1 percent of earners took in more than 10 percent of the personal income in the United States, including capital gains, and the top 1 percent took in more than 20 percent. But economists had little idea who these people were. How many were Wall street financiers? Sports stars? Entrepreneurs? Economists could only speculate, and debates over what is fair stalled.



The complete article:

With executive pay, rich pull away from rest of America - The Washington Post:

Friday, June 17, 2011

Immigrants or their Children Founded 40% of Fortune 500 Companies

An informative new report by the Partnership for a New American Economy has revealed the extent to which immigrants and their children contribute to the national economy.

The report, The 'New American' Fortune 500, has just been released.

Key findings include:

More than 40 percent of the 2010 Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children. Even though immigrants have made up only 10.5 percent
of the American population on average since 1850, there are 90 immigrant-founded
Fortune 500 companies, accounting for 18 percent of the list. When you include the
additional 114 companies founded by the children of immigrants, the share of the
Fortune 500 list grows to over 40 percent.

The newest Fortune 500 companies are more likely to have an immigrant founder.
Just shy of 20 percent of the newest Fortune 500 companies — those founded over the
25-year period between 1985 and 2010 — have an immigrant founder.
Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants or children of immigrants employ
more than 10 million people worldwide. Immigrant-founded Fortune 500 companies
alone employ more than 3.6 million people, a figure equivalent to the entire population
of Connecticut.

The revenue generated by Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants or children
of immigrants is greater than the GDP of every country in the world outside the
U.S., except China and Japan. The Fortune 500 companies that boast immigrant or
children-of-immigrant founders have combined revenues of $4.2 trillion. $1.7 trillion of
that amount comes just from the companies founded by immigrants.

Seven of the 10 most valuable brands in the world come from American companies
founded by immigrants or children of immigrants. Many of America’s greatest brands
— Apple, Google, AT&T, Budweiser, Colgate, eBay, General Electric, IBM, and McDonald’s,
to name just a few — owe their origin to a founder who was an immigrant or the child of
an immigrant.

Immigrant-founded Fortune 500 companies drive a wide range of industry sectors
across the American economy. Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants are not
confined to a small subset of industries or fields. Instead, they range across aerospace,
defense, Internet, consumer products, specialty retail, railroads, insurance, electronics,
hospitality, natural resources, finance, and many other sectors.

The full report can be found here: http://www.renewoureconomy.org/sites/all/themes/pnae/img/new-american-fortune-500-june-2011.pdf

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

US Census: Mexicans are Largest Hispanic Group Nationwide and in 40 States

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2011

2010 Census Shows Nation's Hispanic Population Grew Four Times Faster Than Total U.S. Population

Release Information
CB11-CN.146
Public Information Office
301-763-3030

Brief
Press kit
Spanish Release

Mexicans are Largest Hispanic Group Nationwide and in 40 States

The U.S. Census Bureau today released a 2010 Census brief on the nation's Hispanic population, which shows the Hispanic population increased by 15.2 million between 2000 and 2010 and accounted for more than half of the total U.S. population increase of 27.3 million. Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic population grew by 43 percent, or four times the nation's 9.7 percent growth rate.

The Hispanic Population: 2010 brief looks at an important part of our nation's changing ethnic diversity with a particular focus on Hispanic origin groups, such as Mexican, Dominican and Cuban.

Detailed Hispanic Origin Distribution

About three-quarters of Hispanics in the United States reported as Mexican, Puerto Rican or Cuban origin in the 2010 Census. Mexican origin was the largest group, representing 63 percent of the total U.S. Hispanic population — up from 58 percent in 2000. This group increased by 54 percent and saw the largest numeric change (11.2 million), growing from 20.6 million in 2000 to 31.8 million in 2010. Mexicans accounted for about three-fourths of the 15.2 million increase in the total Hispanic population between 2000 and 2010

The Mexican origin population represented the largest Hispanic group in 40 states, with more than half of these states in the South and West regions of the country, along with two states in the Northeast and all 12 states in the Midwest.

Puerto Ricans, the second largest group, comprised 9 percent of the Hispanic population in 2010 — down from 10 percent in 2000. The Puerto Rican population grew by 36 percent, increasing from 3.4 million to 4.6 million. Puerto Ricans were the largest Hispanic group in six of the nine states in the Northeast and in one western state — Hawaii, with a population of 44,000.

The Cuban origin population increased by 44 percent, growing from 1.2 million in 2000 to 1.8 million in 2010. Cubans made up approximately 4 percent of the total Hispanic population in both the 2000 and 2010 Censuses and were the largest Hispanic origin group in Florida in 2010 with a population of 1.2 million.

Since 2000, three detailed Hispanic origin groups surpassed a population of 1 million: Salvadoran (1.6 million), Dominican (1.4 million) and Guatemalan (1.0 million).

Regional Geographic Distribution

The Hispanic population grew in every region of the United States between 2000 and 2010, and most significantly in the South and Midwest. The South saw a 57 percent increase in its Hispanic population, which was four times the growth of the total population in the South (14 percent). Significant growth also occurred in the Midwest, where the Hispanic population grew by 49 percent. This was more than 12 times the growth of the total population in the Midwest (4 percent).

While the Hispanic population grew at a slower rate in the West and Northeast, the regions still saw significant growth between 2000 and 2010. The Hispanic population grew by 34 percent in the West, which was more than twice the growth of the total population in the West (14 percent). The Northeast's Hispanic population grew by 33 percent, or 10 times the growth of the total population in the Northeast (3 percent).

States

More than half of the Hispanic population in the United States resided in just three states: California, Texas and Florida. In 2010, 37.6 million, or 75 percent, of Hispanics lived in the eight states with Hispanic populations of 1 million or more: California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Arizona, New Jersey and Colorado. Hispanics in California accounted for 28 percent (14.0 million) of the total Hispanic population, while the Hispanic population in Texas accounted for 19 percent (9.5 million). Hispanics in Florida accounted for 8 percent (4.2 million) of the U.S. Hispanic population.

The Hispanic population experienced growth between 2000 and 2010 in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. In eight states in the South (Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee) and in South Dakota, the Hispanic population more than doubled in size between 2000 and 2010. Even with this large growth rate, the percentage of Hispanics in 2010 in each of these states remained less than 9 percent, far below the national level of 16 percent.

Hispanics in New Mexico comprised 46 percent of the total state population, the highest proportion for any state. Hispanics were 16 percent or more of the state population (matching or exceeding the national level) in eight other states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York and Texas.

Counties

Hispanics were the majority of the population in 82 out of the nation's 3,143 counties. In the South, Hispanics were the majority in 51 Texas counties and one Florida county (Miami-Dade). In the West, Hispanics were the majority in 12 New Mexico counties, nine California counties and two counties in each of the following states: Arizona (Santa Cruz and Yuma), Colorado (Conejos and Costilla) and Washington (Adams and Franklin).

In the Midwest, Hispanics were the majority in two Kansas counties (Ford and Seward), and in the Northeast, Hispanics were the majority in one New York county (Bronx).

Counties with the highest proportions of Hispanics were concentrated in bands along the states bordering Mexico — Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California.

Concentrations of Hispanics were also found outside these border states. In particular, Hispanic concentrations were found in counties within central Washington; in Kansas, Idaho, Oklahoma, Nebraska and Colorado; around Chicago and along the East Coast from New York to Virginia; in central and southern Florida; and the District of Columbia.

The Hispanic population increased to more than twice its size since 2000 in at least one of every four counties. Of the 3,143 counties in the United States, Hispanics at least doubled in population size in 912 of them. Among the 469 counties with at least 10,000 or more Hispanics in 2010, the top five fastest growing counties were Luzerne, Pa. (479 percent change); Henry, Ga. (339 percent change); Kendall, Ill. (338 percent change); Douglas, Ga. (321 percent change); and Shelby, Ala. (297 percent change).

-X-

Editor's note: “People of Mexican origin” refers to people who report their origin as Mexican. It can include people born in Mexico, in the United States, or in other countries. This holds true for all the detailed Hispanic origin groups discussed in the brief (e.g., people of Cuban origin, Salvadoran origin, etc). The question on Hispanic origin is an ethnicity question and not a place of birth question. All Hispanic origin responses are based on self-identification. Throughout the brief, terms such as “Mexican origin” and “Mexicans” as well as “Cuban origin” and “Cubans” are used interchangeably, and in all cases refer to the ethnic origin of the person, not exclusively their place of birth or nationality.

Monday, May 30, 2011

The Bilingual Advantage -Alzheimer Symptoms Delayed

This NY Times interview with cognitive neurologist Ellen Bialystok highlights an unexpected benefit of bilingualism: that it appears to delay the onset of Alzheimer disease symptoms.

The link to the article:


The Bilingual Advantage - NYTimes.com

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

El Presidente de Mexico, Felipe Calderón Promulga Ley de Migración

El día de hoy, el Presidente Felipe Calderón, ha promulgado la Ley de Migración que el Congreso de la Unión aprobó a fines del mes de abril.

La nueva ley se enfoca en atender la problemática de la inmigración a México y descuida la emigración de mexicanos a Estados Unidos.

Representantes de organizaciones de derechos humanos han criticado importantes deficiencias en la nueva ley, tal como la negación a otorgar visas de transito a migrantes que cruzan por territorio mexicano para eliminar su estatus de indocumentados y, en consecuencia, hacerlos menos vulnerables ante el crimen organizado, autoridades corruptas, etc.

Por otra parte, la ley se considera un avance en relación a la desfasada Ley General de Población de 1974 que, hasta ahora, representaba el marco legal para regular la llegada a territorio nacional de extranjeros y establecía sus derechos y obligaciones.


Calderón promulga ley de Migración - El Universal - Nación

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Blake traza los 4 ejes de la política migratoria

El Secretario de Gobernación de México, Jose Francisco Blake, ha declarado que el gobierno mexicano ha adoptado una nueva política publica en torno a la migración, la cual los siguientes 4 ejes: modernización, revisión de responsabilidades, eficiencia en tramites, y rendición de cuentas.

La nota completa:


Blake traza los 4 ejes de la política migratoria - El Universal - México

La Educación Publica en México: El rumbo perdido

En el actual numero de la revista Nexos encontramos una excelente discusion sobre los desafios que Mexico enfrenta para mejorar su sistema de educacion publica.

El articulo central es "El Rumbo Perdido", escrito por Gilberto Guevara Niebla, quien ofrece un análisis de la evolución del sistema educativo en el siglo XX, particularmente a partir del sexenio de Manuel Avila Camacho.

Guevara Niebla destaca la continuidad que ha existido desde entonces en un sistema que ha sido centralizado y que ha empleado un modelo educativo desfasado tanto de la realidad e intereses de la sociedad mexicana como de las innovaciones educativas a nivel internacional.

El link para el articulo:

Nexos - El rumbo perdido

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Migrantes reprochan en EU violencia al Presidente Felipe Calderon

En una reunion con mexicanos radicados en Las Vegas, el Presidente Felipe Calderon recibio quejas de estos, quienes manifesaron su inconformidad y temor por la violencia que existe en el pais y que resulta en una mayor inseguridad para ellos al regresar a su patria.

La nota completa:


Migrantes reprochan en EU violencia a FCH - El Universal - México

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

The DREAM Act To Be Introduced Into the Senate and House on Wednesday, May 11

For Immediate Release


What: Press Briefing --- The DREAM Act To Be Introduced Into the Senate and House on Wednesday, May 11

Where: Immigrant Legal Resource Center
1663 Mission St., Ste. 602
San Francisco, CA 94103

When: 11 a.m. (briefing will be repeated in a briefer format at 12 noon)
For Further Information: Mark Silverman:, tel: 4l5 305 8217 – mark@ilrc.org
Bay Area contacts: DREAM Act students who are available for interviews: Natalia: at 408 568 2273, can appear in written press or on radio;
Saul, (408) 891 7921, can appear in written press or on radio; Monica, 925 698 9025, all media;

ILRC and Others Commend Senators and Congresspersons for Introducing the DREAM Act on Wednesday, May 11

San Francisco, May 10, 2011 -- The Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), other organizations and DREAM Act students commend principal author, Senator Richard Durbin, co-sponsors Senators Boxer and Feinstein of California, and the other co-sponsors in the Senate, and Congressman Berman and other sponsors in the House for their planned introduction of DREAM Act legislation into the Senate and House on Wednesday, May 11th.

The DREAM Act, which based on last session’s provisions of the bills, provides the opportunity for undocumented students who entered the United States as children to obtain legal status if they pursue college education or join the military.

“The DREAM Act is good and fair for these children, good for our economy, and good older Americans who will be depending for the social security on contributions by younger workers and professionals, including the DREAM Act students, and generally good for our country,” stated Mark Silverman, Director of Immigration Policy of the ILRC.

VALORACION DE MÉXICO DISMINUYE EN EU - GALLUP WORLD AFFAIRS

VALORACION DE MÉXICO DISMINUYE EN EU

GALLUP WORLD AFFAIRS

07/05/2011

La encuesta anual de Gallup World Affairs, señala que México se encuentra en la media de la tabla que incluye 21 países, con un 45% de aprobación positiva, solamente dos puntos por encima del mínimo medido en 1993 y muy por debajo del 74% que obtuvo hace seis años.

?Es la segunda vez que Gallup ha hallado más estadunidenses con una imagen negativa en lugar de positiva de México?, entre las principales causas de la imagen negativa de México entre los estadounidenses, se encuentran la violencia asociada con el narcotráfico y la inmigración ilegal, sugiere el análisis de Gallup.

Canadá es el país con mejor imagen en Estados Unidos, seguido de Gran Bretaña (88 por ciento positiva), mientras que en el extremo inferior de la tabla, Irán recibe 85 por ciento de opinión negativa, seguido de Corea del Norte, con 84 por ciento y Afganistán, con 82 por ciento.




VALORACION DE MÉXICO DISMINUYE EN EU - GALLUP WORLD AFFAIRS - Consulta Mitofsky

Remarks by the President on Comprehensive Immigration Reform in El Paso, Texas

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release May 10, 2011
Remarks by the President on Comprehensive Immigration Reform in El Paso, Texas

Chamizal National Memorial El Paso, Texas

1:21 P.M. MDT

THE PRESIDENT: Hello, El Paso! (Applause.) Well, it is wonderful -- wonderful to be back with all of you in the Lone Star State. (Applause.) Everything is bigger in Texas. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you!

THE PRESIDENT: I love you back! (Applause.) Even the welcomes are bigger. (Applause.) So, in appreciation, I wanted to give a big policy speech outside on a really hot day. (Laughter.) Those of you who are still wearing your jackets, feel free to take them off. I hope everybody is wearing sunscreen.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: We live here.

THE PRESIDENT: You say you live here? You don’t need it, huh? (Laughter.) Well, it is a great honor to be here. And I want to express my appreciation to all of you for taking the time to come out today.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you!

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. I appreciate it. Thank you. (Applause.)

You know, about a week ago, I delivered a commencement address at Miami Dade Community College, which is one of the most diverse schools in the nation. The graduates were proud that their class could claim heritage from 181 countries around the world -- 181 countries. (Applause.)

Many of the students were immigrants themselves, coming to America with little more than the dream of their parents and the clothes on their back. A handful had discovered only in adolescence or adulthood that they were undocumented. But they worked hard and they gave it their all, and so they earned those diplomas.

And at the ceremony, 181 flags -- one for every nation that was represented -- was marched across the stage. And each one was applauded by the graduates and the relatives with ties to those countries. So when the Haitian flag went by, all the Haitian kids -- Haitian American kids shouted out. And when the Guatemalan flag went by, all the kids of Guatemalan heritage shouted out. And when the Ukrainian flag went by, I think one kid shouted out. (Laughter.) This was down in Miami. (Laughter.) If it had been in Chicago, there would have been more.

But then, the last flag, the American flag, came into view. And everyone in the room erupted in applause. Everybody cheered. (Applause.) So, yes, their parents and grandparents -- some of the graduates themselves -- had come from every corner of the globe. But it was here that they had found opportunity. It was here that they had a chance to contribute to the nation that is their home.

And it was a reminder of a simple idea, as old as America itself: E pluribus unum. Out of many, one. We define ourselves as a nation of immigrants -- a nation that welcomes those willing to embrace America’s ideals and America’s precepts. That’s why millions of people, ancestors to most of us, braved hardship and great risk to come here -- so they could be free to work and worship and start a business and live their lives in peace and prosperity. The Asian immigrants who made their way to California’s Angel Island. The German and Scandinavians who settled across the Midwest. The waves of Irish, and Italian, and Polish, and Russian, and Jewish immigrants who leaned against the railing to catch their first glimpse of the Statue of Liberty.

This flow of immigrants has helped make this country stronger and more prosperous. (Applause.) We can point to the genius of Einstein, the designs of I. M. Pei, the stories of Isaac Asimov, the entire industries that were forged by Andrew Carnegie.

And then when I think about immigration I think about the naturalization ceremonies that we’ve held at the White House for members of our military. Nothing could be more inspiring. Even though they were not yet citizens when they joined our military, these men and women signed up to serve.

We did one event at the White House and a young man named Granger Michael from Papua New Guinea, a Marine who had been deployed to Iraq three times, was there. And you know what he said about becoming an American citizen? He said, “I might as well. I love this country already.” That’s all he said. Marines aren’t big on speeches. (Laughter.)

Another was a woman named Perla Ramos who was born and raised in Mexico and came to the United States shortly after 9/11, and joined the Navy. And she said, “I take pride in our flag and the history we write day by day.”

That’s the promise of this country -- that anyone can write the next chapter in our story. It doesn’t matter where you come from -- (applause) -- it doesn’t matter where you come from; it doesn’t matter what you look like; it doesn’t matter what faith you worship. What matters is that you believe in the ideals on which we were founded; that you believe that all of us are created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights. (Applause.) All of us deserve our freedoms and our pursuit of happiness. In embracing America, you can become American. That is what makes this country great. That enriches all of us.

And yet, at the same time, we’re here at the border today -- (applause) -- we’re here at the border because we also recognize that being a nation of laws goes hand in hand with being a nation of immigrants. This, too, is our heritage. This, too, is important. And the truth is, we’ve often wrestled with the politics of who is and who isn’t allowed to come into this country. This debate is not new.

At times, there has been fear and resentment directed towards newcomers, especially in hard economic times. And because these issues touch deeply on what we believe, touch deeply on our convictions -- about who we are as a people, about what it means to be an American -- these debates often elicit strong emotions.

That’s one reason it’s been so difficult to reform our broken immigration system. When an issue is this complex, when it raises such strong feelings, it’s easier for politicians to defer until the problem the next election. And there’s always a next election.

So we’ve seen a lot of blame and a lot of politics and a lot of ugly rhetoric around immigration. And we’ve seen good faith efforts from leaders of both parties -- by the way, I just noticed, those of you who have chairs, if you want to sit down, feel free. There’s no rule about having to stand when I’m --

AUDIENCE MEMBER: -- we love you! (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: But we’ve seen leaders of both parties who try to work on this issue, but then their efforts fell prey to the usual Washington games. And all the while, we’ve seen the mounting consequences of decades of inaction.

Today, there are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants here in the United States. Some crossed the border illegally. Others avoid immigration laws by overstaying their visas. Regardless of how they came, the overwhelming majority of these folks are just trying to earn a living and provide for their families. (Applause.)

But we have to acknowledge they’ve broken the rules. They’ve cut in front of the line. And what is also true is that the presence of so many illegal immigrants makes a mockery of all those who are trying to immigrate legally.

Also, because undocumented immigrants live in the shadows, where they’re vulnerable to unscrupulous businesses that skirt taxes, and pay workers less than the minimum wage, or cut corners with health and safety laws, this puts companies who follow the rules, and Americans who rightly demand the minimum wage or overtime or just a safe place to work, it puts those businesses at a disadvantage.

Think about it. Over the past decade, even before the recession hit, middle-class families were struggling to get by as the costs went up for everything, from health care, to college tuition, to groceries, to gas. Their incomes didn’t go up with those prices. We’re seeing it again right now with gas prices.

So one way to strengthen the middle class in America is to reform the immigration system so that there is no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody else. I want incomes for middle-class families to rise again. (Applause.) I want prosperity in this country to be widely shared. (Applause.) I want everybody to be able to reach that American dream. And that’s why immigration reform is an economic imperative. It’s an economic imperative. (Applause.)

And reform will also help to make America more competitive in the global economy. Today, we provide students from around the world with visas to get engineering and computer science degrees at our top universities. (Applause.)

But then our laws discourage them from using those skills to start a business or a new industry here in the United States. Instead of training entrepreneurs to stay here, we train them to create jobs for our competition. That makes no sense. In a global marketplace, we need all the talent we can attract, all the talent we can get to stay here to start businesses -- not just to benefit those individuals, but because their contribution will benefit all Americans.

Look at Intel, look at Google, look at Yahoo, look at eBay. All those great American companies, all the jobs they’ve created, everything that has helped us take leadership in the high-tech industry, every one of those was founded by, guess who, an immigrant. (Applause.)

So we don’t want the next Intel or the next Google to be created in China or India. We want those companies and jobs to take root here. (Applause.) Bill Gates gets this. He knows a little something about the high-tech industry. He said, “The United States will find it far more difficult to maintain its competitive edge if it excludes those who are able and willing to help us compete.”

So immigration is not just the right thing to do. It’s smart for our economy. It’s smart for our economy. (Applause.) And it’s for this reason that businesses all across America are demanding that Washington finally meet its responsibilities to solve the immigration problem. Everybody recognizes the system is broken. The question is, will we finally summon the political will to do something about it? And that’s why we’re here at the border today.

And I want to say I am joined today by an outstanding Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, who’s been working tirelessly on this issue. (Applause.) Our commissioner who’s working diligently on border issues, Alan Bersin, is there, and we appreciate him -- Bersin. (Applause.)

So they’re doing outstanding work. And in recent years, among one of the greatest impediments to reform were questions about border security. And these were legitimate concerns. What was true was a lack of manpower and a lack of resources at the border, combined with the pull of jobs and ill-considered enforcement once folks were in the country.

All this contributed to a growing number of undocumented people living in the United States. And these concerns helped unravel a bipartisan coalition that we had forged back when I was in the United States Senate. So in the years since, “borders first, borders first,” that's become the common refrain, even among those who were previously supportive of comprehensive immigration reform.

But over the last two years, thanks to the outstanding work of Janet and Alan and everybody who’s down here working at the border, we’ve answered those concerns. Under their leadership, we have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible. They wanted more agents at the border. Well, we now have more boots on the ground on the southwest border than at any time in our history. (Applause.)

The Border Patrol has 20,000 agents -- more than twice as many as there were in 2004. It’s a build-up that began under President Bush and that we’ve continued, and I had a chance to meet some of these outstanding agents, and actually saw some of them on horseback who looked pretty tough. (Laughter.) So we put the agents here.

Then they wanted a fence. Well, the fence is --

AUDIENCE: Booo!

THE PRESIDENT: The fence is now basically complete.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Tear it down!

THE PRESIDENT: Then we’ve gone further. We tripled the number of intelligence analysts working at the border. I’ve deployed unmanned aerial vehicles to patrol the skies from Texas to California. We have forged a partnership with Mexico to fight the transnational criminal organizations that have affected both of our countries. (Applause.) And for the first time -- for the first time we’re screening 100 percent of southbound rail shipments to seize guns and money going south even as we go after drugs that are coming north. (Applause.)

So, here’s the point. I want everybody to listen carefully to this. We have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement. All the stuff they asked for, we’ve done. But even though we’ve answered these concerns, I’ve got to say I suspect there are still going to be some who are trying to move the goal posts on us one more time.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: They’re racist!

THE PRESIDENT: You know, they said we needed to triple the Border Patrol. Or now they’re going to say we need to quadruple the Border Patrol. Or they’ll want a higher fence. Maybe they’ll need a moat. (Laughter.) Maybe they want alligators in the moat. (Laughter.) They’ll never be satisfied. And I understand that. That’s politics.

But the truth is the measures we’ve put in place are getting results. Over the past two and a half years, we’ve seized 31 percent more drugs, 75 percent more currency, 64 percent more weapons than ever before. (Applause.) And even as we have stepped up patrols, apprehensions along the border have been cut by nearly 40 percent from two years ago. That means far fewer people are attempting to cross the border illegally.

And also, despite a lot of breathless reports that have tagged places like El Paso as dangerous, violent crime in southwest border counties has dropped by a third. El Paso and other cities and towns along this border are consistently among the safest in the nation. (Applause.) Of course, we shouldn’t accept any violence or crime. And we’ve always got more work to do. But this progress is important and it’s not getting reported on.

And we’re also going beyond the border. Beyond the border, we’re going after employers who knowingly exploit people and break the law. (Applause.) And we are deporting those who are here illegally. And that’s a tough issue. It’s a source of controversy.

But I want to emphasize we’re not doing it haphazardly. We’re focusing our limited resources and people on violent offenders and people convicted of crimes -- not just families, not just folks who are just looking to scrape together an income. And as a result, we’ve increased the removal of criminals by 70 percent. (Applause.)

That’s not to ignore the real human toll of a broken immigration system. Even as we recognize that enforcing the law is necessary, we don’t relish the pain that it causes in the lives of people who are just trying to get by and get caught up in the system.

And as long as the current laws are on the books, it’s not just hardened felons who are subject to removal, but sometimes families who are just trying to earn a living, or bright, eager students, or decent people with the best of intentions. (Applause.)

And sometimes when I talk to immigration advocates, they wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how a democracy works. What we really need to do is to keep up the fight to pass genuine, comprehensive reform. That is the ultimate solution to this problem. That's what I’m committed to doing. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yes, we can! Yes, we can!

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, we can. We can do it. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: Yes, we can! Yes, we can! Yes, we can!

THE PRESIDENT: The most significant step we can now take to secure the borders is to fix the system as a whole so that fewer people have the incentive to enter illegally in search of work in the first place. This would allow agents to focus on the worst threats on both of our -- both sides of our borders, from drug traffickers to those who would come here to commit acts of violence or terror. That’s where our focus should be.

So, El Paso, the question is whether those in Congress who previously walked away in the name of enforcement are now ready to come back to the table and finish the work that we’ve started. (Applause.) We’ve got to put the politics aside. And if we do, I’m confident we can find common ground.

Washington is lagging behind the country on this. There is already a growing coalition of leaders across America who don’t always see eye-to-eye, but are coming together on this issue. They see the harmful consequences of a broken immigration system for their businesses and for their communities, and they understand why we need to act.

There are Democrats and Republicans, people like former Republican Senator Mel Martinez; former Bush administration Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff; leaders like Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York; evangelical ministers like Leith Anderson and Bill Hybels; police chiefs from across the nation; educators; advocates; labor unions; chambers of commerce; small business owners; Fortune 500 CEOs.

I mean, one CEO had this to say about reform: “American ingenuity is a product of the openness and diversity of this society. Immigrants have made America great as the world leader in business, in science, higher education and innovation.” You know who that leader was? Rupert Murdoch, who owns FOX News, and is an immigrant himself. I don’t know if you’re familiar with Rupert Murdoch’s views, but let’s just say he doesn’t have an Obama sticker on his car. (Laughter.) But he agrees with me on this. (Applause.)

So there is a consensus around fixing what’s broken. And now we need Congress to catch up. Now we need to come together around reform that reflects our values as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants; reform that demands that everybody take responsibility. So what would comprehensive reform look like?

First, we know that government has a threshold responsibility to secure our borders and enforce the law. And that’s what Janet and all her folks are doing. That’s what they’re doing. (Applause.)

Second, businesses have to be held accountable if they exploit undocumented workers. (Applause.)

Third, those who are here illegally, they have a responsibility as well. So they broke the law, and that means they’ve got to pay their taxes, they’ve got to pay a fine, they’ve got to learn English. And they’ve got to undergo background checks and a lengthy process before they get in line for legalization. That’s not too much to ask. (Applause.)

And fourth, stopping illegal immigration also depends on reforming our outdated system of legal immigration. (Applause.) We should make it easier for the best and the brightest to not only stay here, but also to start businesses and create jobs here. In recent years, a full 25 percent of high-tech startups in the U.S. were founded by immigrants. That led to 200,000 jobs here in America. I’m glad those jobs are here. I want to see more of them created in this country. We need to provide them the chance. (Applause.)

We need to provide our farms a legal way to hire workers that they rely on, and a path for those workers to earn legal status. (Applause.) And our laws should respect families following the rules -- reuniting them more quickly instead of splitting them apart. (Applause.)

Today, the immigration system not only tolerates those who break the rules, but it punishes folks who follow the rules. While applications -- while applicants wait for approval, for example, they’re often forbidden from visiting the United States. Even husbands and wives may have to spend years apart. Parents can’t see their children. I don’t believe the United States of America should be in the business of separating families. That’s not right. That’s not who we are. We can do better than that. (Applause.)

And we should stop punishing innocent young people for the actions of their parents. (Applause.) We should stop denying them the chance to earn an education or serve in the military. And that’s why we need to pass the DREAM Act. (Applause.) Now, we passed the DREAM Act through the House last year when Democrats were in control. But even though it received a majority of votes in the Senate, it was blocked when several Republicans who had previously supported the DREAM Act voted no.

That was a tremendous disappointment to get so close and then see politics get in the way. And as I gave that commencement at Miami Dade, it broke my heart knowing that a number of those promising, bright students -- young people who worked so hard and who speak about what’s best in America -- are at risk of facing the agony of deportation. These are kids who grew up in this country. They love this country. They know no other place to call home. The idea that we’d punish them is cruel. It makes no sense. We’re a better nation than that. (Applause.)

So we’re going to keep fighting for the DREAM Act. We’re going to keep up the fight for reform. (Applause.) And that’s where you come in. I’m going to do my part to lead a constructive and civil debate on these issues. And we’ve already had a series of meetings about this at the White House in recent weeks. We’ve got leaders here and around the country helping to move the debate forward.

But this change ultimately has to be driven by you, the American people. You’ve got to help push for comprehensive reform, and you’ve got to identify what steps we can take right now -- like the DREAM Act, like visa reform -- areas where we can find common ground among Democrats and Republicans and begin to fix what’s broken.

So I’m asking you to add your voices to this debate. You can sign up to help at whitehouse.gov. We need Washington to know that there is a movement for reform that’s gathering strength from coast to coast. That’s how we’ll get this done. That’s how we can ensure that in the years ahead we are welcoming the talents of all who can contribute to this country and that we’re living up to the basic American idea that you can make it here if you try. (Applause.)

That’s the idea that gave hope to José Hernández. Is José here? Where’s -- José is right over there. (Applause.) I want you to hear -- I want you to think about this story. José’s parents were migrant farm workers. And so, growing up, he was too. He was born in California, though he could have just as easily been born on the other side of the border, if it had been a different time of year, because his family moved around with the seasons. So two of his siblings were actually born in Mexico.

So they traveled a lot, and José joined his parents picking cucumbers and strawberries. And he missed part of school when they returned to Mexico each winter. José didn’t learn English until he was 12 years old. But you know what, José was good at math and he liked math. And the nice thing is that math was the same in every school, and it’s the same in Spanish as it is in English.

So José studied, and he studied hard. And one day, he’s standing in the fields, collecting sugar beets, and he heard on a transistor radio that a man named Franklin Chang-Diaz -- a man with a surname like his -- was going to be an astronaut for NASA. So José decided -- right there in the field, he decided -- well, I could be an astronaut, too.

So José kept on studying, and he graduated high school. And he kept on studying, and he earned an engineering degree. And he kept on studying, and he earned a graduate degree. And he kept on working hard, and he ended up at a national laboratory, helping to develop a new kind of digital medical imaging system.

And a few years later, he found himself more than 100 miles above the surface of the Earth, staring out of the window of the shuttle Discovery, and he was remembering the boy in the California fields with that crazy dream that in America everything is possible. (Applause.)

Think about that, El Paso. That’s the American Dream right there. (Applause.) That's what we’re fighting for. We are fighting for every boy and every girl like José with a dream and potential that's just waiting to be tapped. We are fighting to unlock that promise, and all that holds not just for their futures, but for America’s future. That's why we’re going to get this done. And that's why I’m going to need your help.

Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)

END
1:56 P.M. MDT

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Video of Obama Interview on Osama Bin Laden Death

The following is the complete video of the interview granted by President Obama to 60 minutes on the military operative to "hunt Osama Bin Laden down" and the subsequent death of the Al Qaeda leader during the operation.

It is important to remember that the 9/11 put an end to the attempt then being made by the Mexican and US administrations to establish a binational migration agreement. Thus, immigrants from Mexico and elsewhere were among the greatest victims of the Al Qaeda terrorist activities.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Presidential “Latinos and Education” Town Hall—A Key to Winning the Future

President Obama held a town hall meeting in a predominantly Latino school in Washington, D.C. to discuss the educational challenges faced by our youth and the pivotal role young Latinos will play in the nation's future.

The meeting was later televised on Univision.

This White House blog entry highlights some of the key points relevant to a discussion of Latinos and education:


Presidential “Latinos and Education” Town Hall—A Key to Winning the Future | The White House

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Senado de México Aprueba Nueva Ley de Migración

El jueves pasado el Senado mexicano aprobó una iniciativa que buscaba actualizar y mejorar las políticas nacionales en torno a la migración, particularmente a la inmigración y a la transmigración - fenómenos relacionados al ingreso de personas provenientes de otros países a México.

La iniciativa tuvo modificaciones significativas en las ultimas etapas del proceso legislativo. La iniciativa pasa ahora a la Cámara de Diputados.

El activista migrante Primitivo Rodriguez explica lo ocurrido en un mensaje que circula por las redes de migrantes:

¡INESPERADA E HISTÓRICA VICTORIA DE LOS PUEBLOS MIGRANTES EN EL SENADO DE LA REPÚBLICA!

Apreciadas amigas y amigos, con mucho gusto les envío el informe sobre un voto fuera de lo común que tuvo lugar ayer jueves. Espero les sea de utilidad, al menos para tomarse un buen tequila o mezcal...o tres.

1. El dictamen sobre la Ley de Migración cambió sustancialmente.

El día de ayer, jueves 24, alrededor de las 3 de la tarde las 86 Senadoras y Senadores presentes en la sesión del Senado aprobaron por unanimidad el dictamen sobre la Ley de Migración. Ese dictamen fue resultado de acuerdos de última hora, y poco o nada tenía que ver con el dictamen que se discutió el jueves 17 y el propio martes 22.

EL PUNTO MÁS TRASCENDENTE DEL CAMBIO LOGRADO EN LAS ÚLTIMAS HORAS DE LA NEGOCIACIÓN FUE EL RELATIVO A OTORGAR UNA VISA DE TRÁNSITO VÁLIDA POR 186 DÍAS A CUALQUIER MIGRANTE QUE LA SOLICITE.

Otros dos acuerdos de gran importancia negociados mientras tenía lugar la sesión de ayer jueves fueron quitar a la Policía Federal toda autoridad e injerencia en el campo migratorio (y por supuesto a cualquier otra policía), y eliminar el castigo a empleadores de indocumentadas/os.

A reserva de analizar con detenimiento el dictamen aprobado en el Senado y verificar que lo dicho en este correo sobre el dictamen es correcto, CELEBREMOS CON MERECIDO GUSTO ESTE PRIMER GRAN PASO DEL PROCESO LEGISLATIVO, ESTA SIGNIFICATIVA VICTORIA QUE RECONOCE Y HONRA LA DIGNIDAD DE TODA/O MIGRANTE, SEA O NO INDOCUMENTADA/O.

Dado que los acuerdos de última hora sobre el dictamen tuvieron lugar prácticamente a puerta cerrada, Estados Unidos y sus redes políticas y sociales en México, así como grupos xenófobos y militaristas del país no supieron lo que venía ni pudieron en consecuencia intervenir en lo que estaba ocurriendo. Con todo, es probable que Estados Unidos y dichos grupos busquen revertir lo aprobado en el Senado, como alertó el Senador Carlos Navarrete, Coordinador del Grupo Parlamentario del PRD, en la Cámara de Diputados.

Entre otros puntos, los poderes afectados por la decisión del Senado buscarían entre otros objetivos: A) devolver a la iniciativa de ley su carácter de instrumento policial para proteger “la seguridad nacional;” B) rechazar en consecuencia las visas de tránsito; C) restaurar la autoridad de la Policía Federal en temas migratorios; D) rechazar el que no se castigue a empleadores de indocumentadas/os.

El dictamen aprobado tiene ahora un contenido dominante de SEGURIDAD HUMANA, no de SEGURIDAD NACIONAL, de PROTECCIÓN A MIGRANTES y no de CONTROL Y CERRAR FRONTERAS. El dictamen RECONOCE LA DIGNIDAD Y DERECHOS DE TADA/O MIGRANTE INDEPENDIENTEMENTE DE SU CONDICIÓN MIGRATORIA, Y VALORA POR IGUAL SU CARÁCTER DE AGENTE DE CAMBIO EN LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DE UN MEJOR FUTURO.

Justo por todo ello podría generarse una fuerte reacción contra el dictamen. Por lo mismo, éste NO SÓLO DEBE SER DEFENDIDO, SINO MEJORADO EN SU CONTENIDO Y PROYECCIÓN. Por otra parte, el dictamen DEBE CONTAR CON AMPLIA BASE SOCIAL DE APOYO, DENTRO Y FUERA DE MÉXICO.

¿Cómo surgió, se generó esta inesperada decisión del Senado?

Llegué ayer al Senado para unirme a una manifestación de protesta contra la iniciativa de Ley de Migración, “peor a la SB 1070 de Arizona” cuyo principal convocante era el Movimiento Migrante Mesoamericano, dirigido por personas como Elvira Arellano, Carlota Botey y José Jacques Medina. El Padre Alejandro Solalinde, director del albergue para migrantes en Oaxaca, Hermanos en el Camino, se uniría a la manifestación.

A la entrada del Senado me encontré con la directora de una de las ONG que formaron parte del grupo de trabajo sobre el dictamen formado en el Senado. De manera suave e indirecta le reproché que “la sociedad civil organizada” que trabajó la iniciativa de ley con Senadoras/es no propuso documentar y entregar permisos de tránsito a migrantes con destino a Estados Unidos, y que sin ese punto todos los demás artículos de la ley protegiendo derechos de migrantes quedarían en bonitas palabras. Me respondió que documentar a migrantes en tránsito era una demanda radical que ni de relajo aprobaría el Senado. Concluí señalándole, más por inconformidad que por certidumbre, que si el Senado aprobaba, como era de esperarse, una ley similar a las de EUA y Arizona, “la hundiríamos en la Cámara de Diputados.”

A reserva de análisis más documentados y “fríos,” pienso que el profundo cambio que sufrió el dictamen en las últimas horas previas al voto fue posible a la conjunción virtuosa de ambientes y hechos como:

· Las múltiples y reiteradas condenas de las políticas y prácticas migratorias de México por parte de migrantes centroamericanas/os, así como sus testimonios públicos sobre las atrocidades de que son víctimas por parte de funcionarios, policías y delincuentes.
· Las condenas en el mismo sentido que han hecho dirigentes de albergues para migrantes en tránsito, organizaciones en México que prestan servicios legales a migrantes, académicas/os, y especialistas en temas migratorios.
· El informe que presentó el miércoles la Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos sobre los miles de secuestros de migrantes que han tenido lugar en los últimos meses.
· El impacto público que logró en la última semana equiparar la iniciativa de Ley de Migración con las leyes antimigrantes de Estados Unidos y de Arizona.
· Señalar, en el mismo sentido, que con dicha iniciativa, México le daba carácter de ley al trabajo sucio que le hacía a Estados Unidos.
· Haberse pasado de listas la Secretaría de Gobernación y la Comisión de Población y Desarrollo, presidida por el PAN, al endurecer el dictamen sin conocimiento de Senadoras/es que lo acordaron la semana pasada.
· El voto en contra del dictamen por parte de 14 Senadores del PRD y 2 del PT en la sesión del pasado martes.
· En esa misma sesión, las más de 50 reservas específicas presentadas sobre el dictamen y que se discutirían en la sesión del jueves.
· La reiterada y bien publicitada oposición al dictamen por parte de Senadores como Ricardo Monreal.
· Las declaraciones del Coordinador del grupo parlamentario del PRI en la Cámara de Diputados, y de dirigentes priistas en contra del dictamen presentado el jueves 17 y el martes 22.
· Los Grupos Parlamentarios del PRI y del PAN decidieron soltarse el pelo, tirar amarras y presumir orgullosos un rostro digno, sensible y visionarios.
· Los golpes políticos y mediáticos de Estados Unidos contra México, destacando en estos días los relativos al asesinato del agente del ICE, Jaime Zapata, en el estado de San Luis Potosí.
· La noticia difundida el miércoles 23 y el propio jueves 24 de que en Arizona se preparan leyes aún más duras que la SB1070.
· La demanda de obispos católicos de México y Centroamérica, dada a conocer ayer, para que la ley que votara el Senado no incluyera criminalización de migrantes, y por el contrario, ayudara a detener el atroz abuso contra ellas y ellos.
· El llamado el miércoles en el mismo sentido del presidente de Guatemala y presidentes de otros países centroamericanos.
· La inconformidad con el dictamen de las ONG y académicas/os que participaron en el grupo de trabajo formado por el Senado.
· La manifestación que tuvo lugar ayer jueves a la entrada del Senado con mantas y consignas que condenaban la “criminalización” de migrantes, y repudiaban el dictamen por ser igual o peor a la SB1070 de Arizona.
· El cabildeo que realizó ayer en persona -y que tuvo de inmediato alto impacto político- el Padre Alejandro Solalinde. El Padre ha ganado singular autoridad moral por su compromiso con migrantes sin documentos a pesar de agresiones y amenazas de muerte que ha recibido de funcionarios y delincuencia organizada. Ayer, en el Senado todo mundo quería salir en la foto con el padre Solalinde, a quien incluso se permitió sentarse un rato en una de las curules reservadas a Senadoras/es. Con el Padre hacían también cabildeo reconocidas defensoras de migrantes como Elvira Arellano y la Hermana Leticia Gutiérrez.
· En un contexto global, sirvieron de “ambiente” favorable para cambiar el dictamen las insurrecciones de pueblos árabes, en estos días, la del pueblo libio.
· Finalmente, con la modestia del caso, habría que señalar el buen impacto que tuvo en medios y en el Senado la Carta Abierta firmada por 40 dirigentes de organizaciones de migrantes, académicas y académicos, activistas, empresarios y religiosos. La Carta tenía como demanda central documentar/dar permisos de tránsito a migrantes de Centroamérica y de otras regiones. Era necesario, indispensable, presentar esta demanda por ser la clave del respeto a la dignidad y derechos de las/os migrantes. Una demanda que por desgracia no estaban impulsando las ONG del grupo de trabajo con el Senado, ni las ONG de derechos humanos. Una demanda que había promovido el PRD en una iniciativa de ley de migración presentada el año pasado, pero que fue obligado a abandonar por no apoyarla otros grupos parlamentarios. Una demanda que sólo hicieron pública e impulsaron hasta el final el Padre Solalinde, el Movimiento Migrante Mesoamericano, y los firmantes de la Carta Abierta, entre los cuales se encuentra un colega de Solalinde, el Padre Flor María Rigoni, director del albergue para migrantes Casa Belén, en Tapachula. Una demanda que pensábamos tenía pocas, muy pocas, poquísimas posibilidades de aceptarse.

Apreciadas amigas y amigos:

FORTALEZCAMOS Y MEJOREMOS EL DICTAMEN APROBADO AYER EN EL SENADO. NO PERMITAMOS QUE LO REVIERTAN O CONGELEN GRUPOS XENÓFOBOS, CORRUPTOS Y MILITARISTAS O LA DELINCUENCIA ORGANIZADA. TAMPOCO DEJEMOS QUE SALGAN ADELANTE LAS AMENAZAS, CHANTAJES Y PROVOCACIONES QUE PUEDA PONER EN JUEGO ESTADOS UNIDOS.


¡Vivan los pueblos migrantes del mundo, Viva su lucha!

¡Salud!

Primitivo

Sigue el Boletín de prensa del Senado sobre la aprobación del dictamen.

jueves, 24 de febrero de 2011

El Senado de la República aprobó en lo particular el dictamen que expide la nueva Ley de Migración, que establece la obligatoriedad del Estado de respetar y defender los derechos humanos de los migrantes.

APRUEBA SENADO EN LO PARTICULAR NUEVA LEY MIGRATORIA

EL Senado de la República aprobó en lo particular el dictamen que expide la nueva Ley de Migración, que establece la obligatoriedad del Estado de respetar y defender los derechos humanos de los migrantes.

Los senadores avalaron con 86 votos los 59 artículos que habían sido reservados en la sesión anterior durante la discusión y aprobación en lo general del dictamen.

La Ley tiene como objetivo facilitar y garantizar la movilidad de los indocumentados por territorio nacional, en condiciones de respeto a su vida y dignidad.

Asimismo, este nuevo ordenamiento cataloga a los migrantes como verdaderos sujetos del desarrollo local y global, y no como un peligro o amenaza para las comunidades por donde transitan, asientan o encauzan sus esfuerzos y trabajo.

Al exponer los acuerdos alcanzados, el senador panista Humberto Andrade Quezada, presidente de la Comisión de Población y Desarrollo, afirmó que hoy se está culminando con la cuenta pendiente que tiene el país en el tema migratorio.

Afirmó que la intención del Senado fue dejar de lado “cualquier posible sospecha de la criminalización y la penalización del migrante, independientemente de su estatus migratorio”.
Añadió que “el Senado, en este esfuerzo continuo, el único espíritu que lo mueve es la protección de los derechos humanos”.

Comentó que respecto a los diferendos que existían en torno al artículo 26, donde se estipulaban las obligaciones de la policía en auxilio de las autoridades migratorias; “no modificamos el párrafo tercero, retiramos el artículo en su totalidad”.

Con esto, “queremos mandar una señal muy clara de que el Senado está consciente de la aportación y valor del migrante”, puntualizó.

Además --dijo-- se definió el ámbito de las asociaciones de la sociedad civil que prestan auxilio y acompañan al migrante, para que no sean perseguidas ni sujetas de revisión como lo habían sido hasta ahora.

Resaltó que “se trata de una ley integral, de avanzada, moderna, que permite tener una posición como país de congruencia y de fuerza para exigir en otros lugares, para los nuestros, lo que sí debemos dar en este país en respeto, defensa y protección del migrante”.

Por su parte, el senador Francisco Herrera León, presidente de la Comisión de Asuntos Fronterizos Sur, lamentó que se tenga que reconocer que en lo general no precisamente hemos resguardado y valorado los derechos de los migrantes.

“Ahí están los datos sobre secuestros, sobre trata de personas, sobre tráfico de menores, todo esto que engloba el fenómeno migratorio”, indicó.

Sin embargo, la señal que “este Senado de la República quiere enviar al país, a los migrantes, pero también al mundo, es que en México ni se penaliza ni se criminaliza ni se persigue a nadie”, declaró.

Refirió que entre los fundamentos del dictamen destacan la definición de una política migratoria, hasta hoy ausente; el respeto irrestricto y el reconocimiento a los derechos de los migrantes y el no más facultades a la Secretaría de Seguridad Pública.

“El espíritu de la ley es que el Instituto Nacional de Migración se modernice, se actualice, se ponga al corriente y sea quien atienda, como son sus funciones, el fenómeno migratorio en su totalidad”, aclaró.

El legislador priísta dijo que no se quieren detenciones ni aseguramientos de migrantes, sino “todas las facilidades para su regularización y queremos en el último de los casos acompañamiento y asistencia para un retorno digno de seres humanos”.

Expresó que con esta ley se busca devolverle a México autoridad moral; queremos que esta legislación sea un marco de referencia para la región y el mundo.

En su oportunidad, el senador Tomas Torres Mercado dijo que el PRD comparte que la Policía Federal tenga como tarea central cuidar de la integridad y derechos de los migrantes y de que los que ingresen, salgan o residan en el país.

Agregó que más que convertir a la Ley de Migración en un instrumento de seguridad pública, pone equilibrio a una política de Estado sobre el tema de población y migración, porque la Ley regula el fenómeno migratorio atendiendo al origen, al tránsito y destino que motivan la constante movilidad humana en y hacia el país.

Por el PT, el senador Ricardo Monreal Ávila destacó que en la última etapa de la negociación para la aprobación del dictamen “se modificaron artículos que hubiesen sido ominosos para la tradición política” de México.

Dijo que con la supresión de las disposiciones que otorgaban facultades a la Policía Federal para detener a los indocumentados que transitan por el país y permitían la denuncia anónima en su contra, “ya no queda ninguna duda de que en la Ley no existe indicio alguno para criminalizar la migración”.

Sin embargo, el legislador lamentó que no se avaló su propuesta de institucionalizar las acciones en materia migratoria como el Programa Paisano, que el gobierno federal ha implementado, en los últimos años “porque sí han servido”.

Por Convergencia, el senador Dante Delgado Rannauro reconoció los avances alcanzados, producto tanto de senadores como de la voz de la sociedad, organizaciones no gubernamentales y defensoras de los derechos humanos de inmigrantes que no podían tolerar la criminalización del tránsito por nuestro país.

Agregó que el problema de los flujos migratorios hacia Estados Unidos y de los países latinoamericanos a México o EU, es consecuencia de una política económica global fracasada, que no permite la reactivación económica en las regiones, pues se siguieron modelos sin referente en la economía mundial.

Una vez aprobado el dictamen en lo particular, el senador Arturo Núñez Jiménez, presidente en turno de la Mesa Directiva, felicitó a nombre de ésta a “quienes hicieron posible el acuerdo que honra la tradición de México en materia de asilo, refugiados y en sus propias reivindicaciones con los migrantes mexicanos en Estados Unidos”.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Illegal Immigrant Students Worry After Dream Act Loss - NYTimes.com

A NY Times article discussing the human costs of failed immigration reform. In this case, the perilous situation in which immigrant students find themselves after fighting for approval of the DREAM Act and seeing it fail in Congress:

Illegal Immigrant Students Worry After Dream Act Loss - NYTimes.com

Monday, January 24, 2011

Fallece el obispo Samuel Ruiz

Ha fallecido el obispo Samuel Ruiz, una persona a quien conocimos cuando realizaba su labor pastoral a favor de la comunidades indígenas de Chiapas.

Que descanse en paz este hombre sencillo y tenaz que ha dejado huella en la vida de muchos de nosotros.



Fallece el obispo Samuel Ruiz - El Universal - México

Friday, January 14, 2011

Freedom Gone South - By Joshua E. Keating | Foreign Policy

Freedom House has changed its evaluation of Mexico from free to partly free due to the State's failure to protect citizens from the violence generated by organized crime.

The Foereign Policy article:


Freedom Gone South - By Joshua E. Keating | Foreign Policy

Thursday, January 13, 2011

2010 Immigration Report of State Immigration Laws, Bills, Resolutions

The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)has issued the following press release informing about the results of their 2010 report on state immigration laws:

Broken Federal Immigration Policy Leaves States in a Lurch

With no federal legislation, state legislators move to enact local solutions.

Congress again failed to consider comprehensive immigration reform in 2010. Despite federal inaction, state legislatures continue to lead the way in addressing the complex and challenging issue of immigration.

According to a new immigration report from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), states enacted a record number of bills and resolutions on immigration issues during the 2010 sessions.

Forty-six state legislatures and the District of Columbia enacted 208 laws and adopted 138 resolutions for a total of 346. Ten additional bills were vetoed. During the same period in 2009, 44 states enacted 202 laws and adopted 131 resolutions for a total of 333. Twenty bills in 2009 were vetoed. Montana, Nevada, North Dakota or Texas were not in regular session in 2010. Every state that met in regular session in 2010 considered laws related to immigrants and immigration, including legislation addressing legal immigrants, migrant and seasonal workers, refugees or unauthorized immigrants.

"State legislatures will continue to step forward and create local solutions without comprehensive federal legislation," said William Pound, executive director of NCSL. "In the long term, immigration policy requires federal reform, and states look forward to working with the federal government to find effective solutions."
As in previous years, employment, law enforcement and identification/driver’s licenses remained the top issues addressed in state legislation related to immigrants. E-verify legislation was enacted in four states—Georgia, Utah, Virginia and West Virginia. A new area of concern for state legislators in 2010 was child abductions. Alabama, Florida and Tennessee enacted laws to help prevent them.

Getting the most attention last year was Arizona's new immigration laws (SB 1070 and HB 2162). Six bills similar to Arizona's were introduced in Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, South Carolina, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island, but none were enacted.

Summaries of all enacted laws and resolutions are available online in a searchable database and in two PDF charts sorted alphabetically by state and by category.This NCSL publication and PDF are registered with the NCSL copyright and may not be reproduced, uploaded or distributed in any way in its entirety.

Link:

2010 Immigration Report