An article by Rudy Acuña analyzing the weaknesses of Mexican American organizations.
The
Failure of National Latino/Mexican American Organizations
By
Rodolfo
F. Acuña
With all of the hype around Latinos
these days, how could Arizona have happened? I thought we had power. One-third
of Arizona is Latino and its neighbor California is the land of milk and honey
– the favorite destination of politicos of all colors. Over fifty percent of
Los Angeles is Latino; its mayor is Mexican American as is the mayor of San
Antonio, Texas.
Arizona’s war on Mexican Americans does
not make sense, especially in the light of the growth of the Latino population
that now numbers 50 million. This nightmare seems out of place. Alabama
maybe, but Arizona?
It is time that we try to find answers
and admit our weaknesses. The most obvious flaw is that Arizona has exposed a
weakness in Latino and Mexican American organizational infrastructure.
A partial answer as to why Latinos are
so ineffective is that the Latino population is having growing pains. It has
grown dramatically in the past fifty years, going from a regional to a national
phenomenon. This transformation has out stripped the capacity of traditional
organizations such as the League of United Latin American Citizens and the
American GI Forum to deal with this change.
Presently there are only two
organizations that could be called national and they came about in 1968 with
the founding of the Southwest Council of La Raza and the Mexican American Legal
Defense and Education Fund.
Their express purpose was to build a
national presence for Mexican Americans. The SWCLR was the brainchild of Drs.
Julian Samora and Ernesto Galarza who along with Herman Gallegos sold the
project to the Ford Foundation.
Almost simultaneously MALDEF was formed
in San Antonio, with a $2.2 million five-year grant from the Ford Foundation to
implement legal services program. From the beginning Ford monies shaped the
SWCLR andMALDEF.
In 1973, the SWCLR changed its name to
the National Council of La Raza, and moved its headquarters to Washington, D.C.
In the early days Ford micromanaged both organizations, controlling them
by doling out funds.
For instance, at key junctures Ford
threatened to withhold money if the organizations did not follow its advice.
These organizations were fragile at first passing through precarious
times.
In 1975 NCLR expanded its mission to
include non-Mexican American Latino issues. Ironically, its dependence on Ford
and other foundations lessened to the point that by 1980, the NCLR was for a
time almost exclusively funded by the federal government, which created another
set of problems, most noticeable of which was the influence of the powerful
Miami cabal. Its trajectory changed as did its constituency.
Ford also shaped MALDEF. Ford fashioned
its paradigm after the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People, founded in 1909 and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.,
established in 1937.
As Ford became more vested in the Civil
Rights establishment, its own scope broadened to include the Mexican American.
It funded the important University of California Los Angeles study of the 1960
Census. But even then it selected a non-Mexican American, non-expert in the
field to head the project.
Ford knew little about Mexicans. Its
playing card was its experiences with the NACCP. Few of its program officers
had field experience or knew much about Mexican Americans.
As the Mexican American and Latino
populations grew so did their dream of a national organization.
In 1968 the Mexican American
middle-class was small and lacked a history of philanthropic giving. In
other words, it did not have a network of donors to support a national agenda.
Mexican American community organizations also lacked a communication network.
Politically speaking Spanish-language media had no other purpose but to
entertain, depending mostly on an immigrant Spanish-speaking base.
Even today I cannot name a single
Spanish-speaking TV or radio station or, for that matter, English language
station devoted to the political education of “Latinos,” which in the Southwest
meant “Mexican.”
It is only until recently that some
academic presses have begun publishing Mexican American and Latino related
research. A notable exception is the Pew Hispanic Center.
An infrastructure that dots the “i’s”
and crosses the “t’s” was and is totally lacking.
As mentioned, the weakness of the Ford
strategy of building Mexican American national organizations (i.e., nation
building) was that it was based on its Black experience. Ford bureaucrats
failed to take into account that the Black community had a politicized base
forged by history and the fire of the Civil Rights Movement.
The Mexican American community lacked
this infrastructure and indeed lacked a well-defined middle class
Because of this
lack of understanding, Ford’s social engineering experiment failed. Blacks and
Mexican Americans were minorities but they had different histories and
different needs.
Again, the
corporate takeover of Arizona exposed these structural weaknesses. It was
obvious that Mexican Americans and Latinos were vulnerable and incapable of
taking on these corporate vampires.
In fairness MALDEF
has been singular among the national organizations and has brought numerous
suits to protect the civil rights of immigrants and further the equal
protection of the Latino community.
The failure of
MALDEF was to realize that Arizona is a different animal and litigation cannot
be run out of LA or San Antonio. Further, litigation alone does not cut
it because the courts have for over forty years failed to enforce the U.S.
Constitution.
In a conversation
with then MALDEF attorney Mike Baller in the 1970s I pointed out the weakness
of Ford’s strategy and the need to build local support networks.
MALDEF had
started out with close community ties but Ford in the late 1960s yielded to the
pressure of San Antonio Congressman Henry B. Gonzalez that it severe ties with
the local Mexican American Youth Organization and their progressive allies who
were at the time being viciously red-baited. After this point, Ford almost
exclusively worked through Mexican American elites.
In the process
the community’s influence waned. Ford’s interference was similar to when it
forced African American organizations and Black studies programs to severe ties
with Black militants.
Once more,
Arizona totally exposed the fallacy that Latino national organizations and
elites are capable of protecting Mexican American interests. Simply, they
cannot sustain the ugly trench warfare conducted by national corporate elites
and their paid shock troops. In Arizona, these corporate vampires control the
media, the Tea Party, the Republican Party, the schools, other Medias of
communication and also the guns.
Using the worse
kind of racist propaganda, they have demonized the Mexican and Mexican American
as the enemy. The corporate vampires have taken over the prisons and privatized
public institutions converting them into cash registers whose objective is not
to teach, not to rehabilitate, but to cash in.
Arizona also
debunks the myth of a democratic society, showing the total failure of the
Left, which includes elected officials, left of center magazines such as The
Nation, the Democratic Party, along with national organizations of all colors.
I do not blame
these organizations alone; I also blame Mexican American Studies and Mexican
American scholars who have failed to make a case for their discipline.
In this I blame
game I hold people such as myself accountable. When is the last time that we
have cut a check to MALDEF or Save Ethnic Studies? I blame myself for not
being able to explain Mexican American studies to liberals. I have heard
colleagues, veterans of the anti-war and anti-nuke movements, tell me that they
can support the fight against SB 1070 because it is against racism but not HB
2281 because Mexican American Studies is nationalistic. What a crock!
I blame myself for
continuing to support their causes without fighting back! But truth be told, I
support progressive causes because it is the right thing to do.
With the left,
however, it is an “Anything But Mexican” mindset.
The left
correctly supported the Civil Rights Movement and opposed the wars in Vietnam
and the Middle East but when it comes to Mexicans, it nitpicks at motivations.
Even in the cases of Guatemala and El Salvador the American Left hedged.
I am getting
myself worked up but let’s take the case of the teachers’ organizations. Tucson
is a clear example of a gross violation of free speech, the disparate treatment
of a specific group, the denial of teacher and student rights and the
censorship of books. Even so, to date not one national teacher organization has
supported Tucson – not the National Association of Education, not the American
Federation of Teachers, not the American Association of University Professors.
The other day I
received a phone call from an NEA member urging me to send a donation to
President Barack Obama. It was vital to reelect him, she said. I responded that
I was not voting because Obama had done nothing to bring about a resolution in
Tucson. She felt betrayed.
With the Left it
is always their issues, their interests, this attitude is historic.
Who do we blame?
Ourselves. If we do not have strong national organizations it is because of our
inattention.
In closing, the
struggle has not been kept alive by people such as myself, or even the lawyers
or the politicos in Tucson. The teachers have sacrificed their jobs, but if we
win it is because students are fighting back! They have refused to take
direction from the adults, taken over the school board and just this last month
held a Freedom Summer where students from all over the country converged on
Tucson. They did not wait for Ford to tell them how to do it.
¡Qué víva la justicía! ¡Es ahora o nunca se salva la patria!
[“It is said that
Juarez wavered when the time came to sign [Maximilian’s ] the death warrant …
Lerdo…uttered these fateful words: "Ahora o nunca se salva la
patria!"]
*******************************
Fight Back!
Please click on to the links and support. There are two urgent needs:
Depositions
begin this week in the case against HB 2281. You can donate by clicking on to http://saveethnicstudies.org/
. We are run
entirely by volunteers; however, depositions are expensive. Please donate at
least $5 a month.
Depositions
have started in the case against Sean Arce and José González. Four hours of
depositions were taken of both Arce and Gonzalez. Our side deposed Ward this
past week. Please donate: https://www.wepay.com/donations/144408
No comments:
Post a Comment